Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent

PANOWICZ, Robert ;KONARZEWSKI, Marcin ;TRYPOLIN, Michał .
Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent. 
Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, [S.l.], v. 63, n.11, p. 666-672, june 2018. 
ISSN 0039-2480.
Available at: <https://www.sv-jme.eu/sl/article/analysis-of-criteria-for-determining-a-tnt-equivalent/>. Date accessed: 19 nov. 2024. 
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4230.

Panowicz, R., Konarzewski, M., & Trypolin, M.
(2017).
Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent.
Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 63(11), 666-672.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4230

@article{sv-jmesv-jme.2016.4230,
	author = {Robert  Panowicz and Marcin  Konarzewski and Michał  Trypolin},
	title = {Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent},
	journal = {Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering},
	volume = {63},
	number = {11},
	year = {2017},
	keywords = {TNT equivalent; ConWep; blast wave},
	abstract = {The ConWep method is one of the most frequently used methods of modelling the effects of a blast wave impulse on a structure. The main goal of the study was to assess a TNT equivalent used in this approach. Six different methods to calculate this parameter for different explosive materials and charge shapes were analysed in this paper. The results error was lower than 20 % only when a TNT equivalent based on comparing the pressure impulses was used. This error can be lower only for spherical charges. In addition, for the tested distances (25 cm to 40 cm), TNT equivalents with an error margin of 5 % were assessed.},
	issn = {0039-2480},	pages = {666-672},	doi = {10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4230},
	url = {https://www.sv-jme.eu/sl/article/analysis-of-criteria-for-determining-a-tnt-equivalent/}
}

Panowicz, R.,Konarzewski, M.,Trypolin, M.
2017 June 63. Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering. [Online] 63:11

%A Panowicz, Robert 
%A Konarzewski, Marcin 
%A Trypolin, Michał 
%D 2017
%T Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent
%B 2017
%9 TNT equivalent; ConWep; blast wave
%! Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent
%K TNT equivalent; ConWep; blast wave
%X The ConWep method is one of the most frequently used methods of modelling the effects of a blast wave impulse on a structure. The main goal of the study was to assess a TNT equivalent used in this approach. Six different methods to calculate this parameter for different explosive materials and charge shapes were analysed in this paper. The results error was lower than 20 % only when a TNT equivalent based on comparing the pressure impulses was used. This error can be lower only for spherical charges. In addition, for the tested distances (25 cm to 40 cm), TNT equivalents with an error margin of 5 % were assessed.
%U https://www.sv-jme.eu/sl/article/analysis-of-criteria-for-determining-a-tnt-equivalent/
%0 Journal Article
%R 10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4230
%& 666
%P 7
%J Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
%V 63
%N 11
%@ 0039-2480
%8 2018-06-27
%7 2018-06-27

Panowicz, Robert, Marcin  Konarzewski, & Michał  Trypolin.
"Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent." Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering [Online], 63.11 (2017): 666-672. Web.  19 Nov. 2024

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Panowicz, Robert 
AU  - Konarzewski, Marcin 
AU  - Trypolin, Michał 
PY  - 2017
TI  - Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent
JF  - Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
DO  - 10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4230
KW  - TNT equivalent; ConWep; blast wave
N2  - The ConWep method is one of the most frequently used methods of modelling the effects of a blast wave impulse on a structure. The main goal of the study was to assess a TNT equivalent used in this approach. Six different methods to calculate this parameter for different explosive materials and charge shapes were analysed in this paper. The results error was lower than 20 % only when a TNT equivalent based on comparing the pressure impulses was used. This error can be lower only for spherical charges. In addition, for the tested distances (25 cm to 40 cm), TNT equivalents with an error margin of 5 % were assessed.
UR  - https://www.sv-jme.eu/sl/article/analysis-of-criteria-for-determining-a-tnt-equivalent/

@article{{sv-jme}{sv-jme.2016.4230},
	author = {Panowicz, R., Konarzewski, M., Trypolin, M.},
	title = {Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent},
	journal = {Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering},
	volume = {63},
	number = {11},
	year = {2017},
	doi = {10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4230},
	url = {https://www.sv-jme.eu/sl/article/analysis-of-criteria-for-determining-a-tnt-equivalent/}
}

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Panowicz, Robert 
AU  - Konarzewski, Marcin 
AU  - Trypolin, Michał 
PY  - 2018/06/27
TI  - Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent
JF  - Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering; Vol 63, No 11 (2017): Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
DO  - 10.5545/sv-jme.2016.4230
KW  - TNT equivalent, ConWep, blast wave
N2  - The ConWep method is one of the most frequently used methods of modelling the effects of a blast wave impulse on a structure. The main goal of the study was to assess a TNT equivalent used in this approach. Six different methods to calculate this parameter for different explosive materials and charge shapes were analysed in this paper. The results error was lower than 20 % only when a TNT equivalent based on comparing the pressure impulses was used. This error can be lower only for spherical charges. In addition, for the tested distances (25 cm to 40 cm), TNT equivalents with an error margin of 5 % were assessed.
UR  - https://www.sv-jme.eu/sl/article/analysis-of-criteria-for-determining-a-tnt-equivalent/

Panowicz, Robert, Konarzewski, Marcin, AND Trypolin, Michał.
"Analysis of Criteria for Determining a TNT Equivalent" Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering [Online], Volume 63 Number 11 (27 June 2018)