Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters

WAN, Lirong ;JIANG, Kao ;GAO, Kuidong ;ZENG, Qingliang ;ZHANG, Xin .
Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters. 
Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, [S.l.], v. 65, n.7-8, p. 420-429, july 2019. 
ISSN 0039-2480.
Available at: <https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/research-of-response-difference-on-coal-cutting-load-under-different-cutting-parameters/>. Date accessed: 20 dec. 2024. 
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5940.

Wan, L., Jiang, K., Gao, K., Zeng, Q., & Zhang, X.
(2019).
Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters.
Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 65(7-8), 420-429.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5940

@article{sv-jmesv-jme.2018.5940,
	author = {Lirong  Wan and Kao  Jiang and Kuidong  Gao and Qingliang  Zeng and Xin  Zhang},
	title = {Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters},
	journal = {Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering},
	volume = {65},
	number = {7-8},
	year = {2019},
	keywords = {single pick, drum cutting, cutting positions, mounting angles, effectiveness of modification},
	abstract = {Cutting performance is always an important direction in coal research, and it is related to different structural and working parameters. However, most references tend to judge the effectiveness of optimizations with a mean value method while not taking the randomness of load into consideration. Based on this, the paper provides a method to judge the effectiveness of optimizations based on stochastic load fluctuations. Before providing the method, the shearer drum is established, and cutting performance is studied under a different number of conical picks, mounting angles, and cutting positions. To make judgments of optimization effectiveness, we find that only when the “fluctuation by structure” is larger than “fluctuation by randomness” can we make sure that the optimization is valid. Results indicate that the optimization of cutting position variations on cutting performance is invalid. In addition, the order of impact on cutting performance from strong to weak is the number of conical picks, the mounting angles, and cutting positions. The present paper provides a new idea for judging of the effectiveness of structure optimizations from the perspective of load randomness, and it is conductive to enrich related research on coal cutting.},
	issn = {0039-2480},	pages = {420-429},	doi = {10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5940},
	url = {https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/research-of-response-difference-on-coal-cutting-load-under-different-cutting-parameters/}
}

Wan, L.,Jiang, K.,Gao, K.,Zeng, Q.,Zhang, X.
2019 July 65. Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering. [Online] 65:7-8

%A Wan, Lirong 
%A Jiang, Kao 
%A Gao, Kuidong 
%A Zeng, Qingliang 
%A Zhang, Xin 
%D 2019
%T Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters
%B 2019
%9 single pick, drum cutting, cutting positions, mounting angles, effectiveness of modification
%! Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters
%K single pick, drum cutting, cutting positions, mounting angles, effectiveness of modification
%X Cutting performance is always an important direction in coal research, and it is related to different structural and working parameters. However, most references tend to judge the effectiveness of optimizations with a mean value method while not taking the randomness of load into consideration. Based on this, the paper provides a method to judge the effectiveness of optimizations based on stochastic load fluctuations. Before providing the method, the shearer drum is established, and cutting performance is studied under a different number of conical picks, mounting angles, and cutting positions. To make judgments of optimization effectiveness, we find that only when the “fluctuation by structure” is larger than “fluctuation by randomness” can we make sure that the optimization is valid. Results indicate that the optimization of cutting position variations on cutting performance is invalid. In addition, the order of impact on cutting performance from strong to weak is the number of conical picks, the mounting angles, and cutting positions. The present paper provides a new idea for judging of the effectiveness of structure optimizations from the perspective of load randomness, and it is conductive to enrich related research on coal cutting.
%U https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/research-of-response-difference-on-coal-cutting-load-under-different-cutting-parameters/
%0 Journal Article
%R 10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5940
%& 420
%P 10
%J Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
%V 65
%N 7-8
%@ 0039-2480
%8 2019-07-19
%7 2019-07-19

Wan, Lirong, Kao  Jiang, Kuidong  Gao, Qingliang  Zeng, & Xin  Zhang.
"Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters." Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering [Online], 65.7-8 (2019): 420-429. Web.  20 Dec. 2024

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Wan, Lirong 
AU  - Jiang, Kao 
AU  - Gao, Kuidong 
AU  - Zeng, Qingliang 
AU  - Zhang, Xin 
PY  - 2019
TI  - Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters
JF  - Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
DO  - 10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5940
KW  - single pick, drum cutting, cutting positions, mounting angles, effectiveness of modification
N2  - Cutting performance is always an important direction in coal research, and it is related to different structural and working parameters. However, most references tend to judge the effectiveness of optimizations with a mean value method while not taking the randomness of load into consideration. Based on this, the paper provides a method to judge the effectiveness of optimizations based on stochastic load fluctuations. Before providing the method, the shearer drum is established, and cutting performance is studied under a different number of conical picks, mounting angles, and cutting positions. To make judgments of optimization effectiveness, we find that only when the “fluctuation by structure” is larger than “fluctuation by randomness” can we make sure that the optimization is valid. Results indicate that the optimization of cutting position variations on cutting performance is invalid. In addition, the order of impact on cutting performance from strong to weak is the number of conical picks, the mounting angles, and cutting positions. The present paper provides a new idea for judging of the effectiveness of structure optimizations from the perspective of load randomness, and it is conductive to enrich related research on coal cutting.
UR  - https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/research-of-response-difference-on-coal-cutting-load-under-different-cutting-parameters/

@article{{sv-jme}{sv-jme.2018.5940},
	author = {Wan, L., Jiang, K., Gao, K., Zeng, Q., Zhang, X.},
	title = {Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters},
	journal = {Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering},
	volume = {65},
	number = {7-8},
	year = {2019},
	doi = {10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5940},
	url = {https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/research-of-response-difference-on-coal-cutting-load-under-different-cutting-parameters/}
}

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Wan, Lirong 
AU  - Jiang, Kao 
AU  - Gao, Kuidong 
AU  - Zeng, Qingliang 
AU  - Zhang, Xin 
PY  - 2019/07/19
TI  - Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters
JF  - Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering; Vol 65, No 7-8 (2019): Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering
DO  - 10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5940
KW  - single pick, drum cutting, cutting positions, mounting angles, effectiveness of modification
N2  - Cutting performance is always an important direction in coal research, and it is related to different structural and working parameters. However, most references tend to judge the effectiveness of optimizations with a mean value method while not taking the randomness of load into consideration. Based on this, the paper provides a method to judge the effectiveness of optimizations based on stochastic load fluctuations. Before providing the method, the shearer drum is established, and cutting performance is studied under a different number of conical picks, mounting angles, and cutting positions. To make judgments of optimization effectiveness, we find that only when the “fluctuation by structure” is larger than “fluctuation by randomness” can we make sure that the optimization is valid. Results indicate that the optimization of cutting position variations on cutting performance is invalid. In addition, the order of impact on cutting performance from strong to weak is the number of conical picks, the mounting angles, and cutting positions. The present paper provides a new idea for judging of the effectiveness of structure optimizations from the perspective of load randomness, and it is conductive to enrich related research on coal cutting.
UR  - https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/research-of-response-difference-on-coal-cutting-load-under-different-cutting-parameters/

Wan, Lirong, Jiang, Kao, Gao, Kuidong, Zeng, Qingliang, AND Zhang, Xin.
"Research of Response Difference on Coal Cutting Load under Different Cutting Parameters" Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering [Online], Volume 65 Number 7-8 (19 July 2019)