STARBEK, Marko ;GRUM, Janez ;DUHOVNIK, Jože ;KUŠAR, Janez . How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, [S.l.], v. 49, n.4, p. 200-217, november 2017. ISSN 0039-2480. Available at: <https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/how-to-achieve-a-competitive-position-with-a-small-company/>. Date accessed: 20 dec. 2024. doi:http://dx.doi.org/.
Starbek, M., Grum, J., Duhovnik, J., & Kušar, J. (2003). How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 49(4), 200-217. doi:http://dx.doi.org/
@article{.,
author = {Marko Starbek and Janez Grum and Jože Duhovnik and Janez Kušar},
title = {How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company},
journal = {Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering},
volume = {49},
number = {4},
year = {2003},
keywords = {concurrent engineering; loops; team work; project teams; },
abstract = {In 1991 the independence of Slovenia resulted in an enormous decrease in the domestic market for Slovenian companies. Big companies that did not adapt to the new conditions were destined to collapse. Several smaller companies were established, and they were more easily able to adapt to the new market conditions. When these companies entered the global market they encountered several difficulties, the most important of which was an excessively long time for product development. This paper presents the principle of the concurrent product development process. The market forces small companies to switch from sequential to concurrent engineering, and as team work is the basic element of concurrent engineering, special attention has to be paid to forming workgroups in the loops of the concurrent product development process in small companies. A survey of the published works in the field of planning teams in big companies ([1] and [2]) has revealed that in big companies a three-level team structure is recommended, as well as a workgroup consisting of four basic teams. An analysis of the three-level structure has led us to the conclusion that in small companies a two-level team structure and a workgroup consisting of two basic teams is to be preferred. The results of planning a two-level team structure and the implementation of concurrent engineering in a small company that produces mini-loaders are presented.},
issn = {0039-2480}, pages = {200-217}, doi = {},
url = {https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/how-to-achieve-a-competitive-position-with-a-small-company/}
}
Starbek, M.,Grum, J.,Duhovnik, J.,Kušar, J. 2003 November 49. How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering. [Online] 49:4
%A Starbek, Marko %A Grum, Janez %A Duhovnik, Jože %A Kušar, Janez %D 2003 %T How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company %B 2003 %9 concurrent engineering; loops; team work; project teams; %! How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company %K concurrent engineering; loops; team work; project teams; %X In 1991 the independence of Slovenia resulted in an enormous decrease in the domestic market for Slovenian companies. Big companies that did not adapt to the new conditions were destined to collapse. Several smaller companies were established, and they were more easily able to adapt to the new market conditions. When these companies entered the global market they encountered several difficulties, the most important of which was an excessively long time for product development. This paper presents the principle of the concurrent product development process. The market forces small companies to switch from sequential to concurrent engineering, and as team work is the basic element of concurrent engineering, special attention has to be paid to forming workgroups in the loops of the concurrent product development process in small companies. A survey of the published works in the field of planning teams in big companies ([1] and [2]) has revealed that in big companies a three-level team structure is recommended, as well as a workgroup consisting of four basic teams. An analysis of the three-level structure has led us to the conclusion that in small companies a two-level team structure and a workgroup consisting of two basic teams is to be preferred. The results of planning a two-level team structure and the implementation of concurrent engineering in a small company that produces mini-loaders are presented. %U https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/how-to-achieve-a-competitive-position-with-a-small-company/ %0 Journal Article %R %& 200 %P 18 %J Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering %V 49 %N 4 %@ 0039-2480 %8 2017-11-11 %7 2017-11-11
Starbek, Marko, Janez Grum, Jože Duhovnik, & Janez Kušar. "How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company." Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering [Online], 49.4 (2003): 200-217. Web. 20 Dec. 2024
TY - JOUR AU - Starbek, Marko AU - Grum, Janez AU - Duhovnik, Jože AU - Kušar, Janez PY - 2003 TI - How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company JF - Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering DO - KW - concurrent engineering; loops; team work; project teams; N2 - In 1991 the independence of Slovenia resulted in an enormous decrease in the domestic market for Slovenian companies. Big companies that did not adapt to the new conditions were destined to collapse. Several smaller companies were established, and they were more easily able to adapt to the new market conditions. When these companies entered the global market they encountered several difficulties, the most important of which was an excessively long time for product development. This paper presents the principle of the concurrent product development process. The market forces small companies to switch from sequential to concurrent engineering, and as team work is the basic element of concurrent engineering, special attention has to be paid to forming workgroups in the loops of the concurrent product development process in small companies. A survey of the published works in the field of planning teams in big companies ([1] and [2]) has revealed that in big companies a three-level team structure is recommended, as well as a workgroup consisting of four basic teams. An analysis of the three-level structure has led us to the conclusion that in small companies a two-level team structure and a workgroup consisting of two basic teams is to be preferred. The results of planning a two-level team structure and the implementation of concurrent engineering in a small company that produces mini-loaders are presented. UR - https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/how-to-achieve-a-competitive-position-with-a-small-company/
@article{{}{.},
author = {Starbek, M., Grum, J., Duhovnik, J., Kušar, J.},
title = {How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company},
journal = {Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering},
volume = {49},
number = {4},
year = {2003},
doi = {},
url = {https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/how-to-achieve-a-competitive-position-with-a-small-company/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Starbek, Marko AU - Grum, Janez AU - Duhovnik, Jože AU - Kušar, Janez PY - 2017/11/11 TI - How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company JF - Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering; Vol 49, No 4 (2003): Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering DO - KW - concurrent engineering, loops, team work, project teams, N2 - In 1991 the independence of Slovenia resulted in an enormous decrease in the domestic market for Slovenian companies. Big companies that did not adapt to the new conditions were destined to collapse. Several smaller companies were established, and they were more easily able to adapt to the new market conditions. When these companies entered the global market they encountered several difficulties, the most important of which was an excessively long time for product development. This paper presents the principle of the concurrent product development process. The market forces small companies to switch from sequential to concurrent engineering, and as team work is the basic element of concurrent engineering, special attention has to be paid to forming workgroups in the loops of the concurrent product development process in small companies. A survey of the published works in the field of planning teams in big companies ([1] and [2]) has revealed that in big companies a three-level team structure is recommended, as well as a workgroup consisting of four basic teams. An analysis of the three-level structure has led us to the conclusion that in small companies a two-level team structure and a workgroup consisting of two basic teams is to be preferred. The results of planning a two-level team structure and the implementation of concurrent engineering in a small company that produces mini-loaders are presented. UR - https://www.sv-jme.eu/article/how-to-achieve-a-competitive-position-with-a-small-company/
Starbek, Marko, Grum, Janez, Duhovnik, Jože, AND Kušar, Janez. "How to Achieve a Competitive Position with a Small Company" Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering [Online], Volume 49 Number 4 (11 November 2017)
Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering 49(2003)4, 200-217
© The Authors, CC-BY 4.0 Int. Change in copyright policy from 2022, Jan 1st.
In 1991 the independence of Slovenia resulted in an enormous decrease in the domestic market for Slovenian companies. Big companies that did not adapt to the new conditions were destined to collapse. Several smaller companies were established, and they were more easily able to adapt to the new market conditions. When these companies entered the global market they encountered several difficulties, the most important of which was an excessively long time for product development. This paper presents the principle of the concurrent product development process. The market forces small companies to switch from sequential to concurrent engineering, and as team work is the basic element of concurrent engineering, special attention has to be paid to forming workgroups in the loops of the concurrent product development process in small companies. A survey of the published works in the field of planning teams in big companies ([1] and [2]) has revealed that in big companies a three-level team structure is recommended, as well as a workgroup consisting of four basic teams. An analysis of the three-level structure has led us to the conclusion that in small companies a two-level team structure and a workgroup consisting of two basic teams is to be preferred. The results of planning a two-level team structure and the implementation of concurrent engineering in a small company that produces mini-loaders are presented.